How the Institute of Corrosion operates – the Surface Treatment Governing Board and Cathodic Protection Governing Board

How the Institute of Corrosion operates – the Surface Treatment Governing Board and Cathodic Protection Governing Board

The Surface Treatment Governing Board (STGB) is one of two sub-committees that provide support and advice to the Professional Development and Training Committee (PDTC). The other sub-committee is the Cathodic Protection Governing Board (CPGB). STGB is specifically responsible for the Surface Treatment Training Courses, which include all the Coating Inspection courses and their content.

The main responsibility of STGB is to oversee the Requirements Documents (REQ-DOCs) for each of the Surface Treatment schemes, and which describe the training schemes for the Coating Inspection courses. There are currently three main REQ-DOCs for Surface Treatment Courses, one for courses that are normally delivered in the classroom and a separate REQ-DOC for the courses that are delivered on-line. The new Passive Fire Protection Coating Inspector Scheme has a separate REQ-DOC, as there are significant differences in this scheme, in that the Level 3 Inspectors are required to satisfy a Peer Review once they have successfully completed the examination stage. Currently, this is unique to the new PFP Coating Inspector scheme, and it also reflects that some of the training can be delivered on-line as well as in the classroom.

These REQ-DOCs contain all the guidance for operating the courses and the associated examinations and certification, and detail the syllabus for the specific courses. For example, the Protective Coating Inspector scheme, previous known as the Painting Inspector scheme, has three levels, Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3. The REQ-DOC describes the eligibility of potential candidates for the different courses and details the topics that are covered by the three levels. The Protective Coating Inspector scheme also includes the specific training required for Insulation Coating Inspectors (Level 2), Pipeline Coating Inspectors (Level 2) and Hot
Dip Galvanising Coating Inspectors (Level 2).

STGB keep the REQ-DOCs under review so that they can be updated and improved on a regular basis. Once a REQ-DOC has been edited and agreed by STGB, it is submitted to PDTC with a recommendation that the updated version of the REQ-DOC be approved
and published.

STGB is also responsible for reviewing any new Surface Treatment courses that are submitted to ICorr through PDTC, who refer such courses to STGB where a reviewer with the relevant experience is identified. The review is used to make a recommendation to PDTC with regard to the content and quality of the new course and, where appropriate, its conformance with an existing REC-DOC.

In addition to the REQ-DOCs, STGB review applications from the course providers for candidates who wish to become Course Tutors for the classroom courses, or Course Assessors for the on-line courses, and make recommendations to PDTC regarding approval or rejection of these applications. These applications mainly come from the overseas agents who market the ICorr courses in their countries or regions. In all cases Tutors and Assessors must hold the relevant ICorr certification to be eligible to be considered for these roles.

STGB is made up of about six ICorr members, who have knowledge and experience of coatings and coating related inspections, and STGB is chaired by a Level 3 Coating Inspector.

STGB is always looking for additional members and if you have an interest in joining STGB please contact Keith Wagner via the ICorr Office.
CPGB is a sub-committee of Professional Development and Training Committee (PDTC). Both CPGB and the Cathodic Protection Scheme Manager (CPSM), report to the PDTC Chairman, and work closely with one another to ensure an effective running and management of the Cathodic Protection courses and exams. These include CP levels 1 to 4. All members of CPGB are CP specialists in at least one of the four sectors of CP. The CP Scheme Manager is also a member of the CP Governing Board, which meets on a regular basis.

CPGB ensures as a minimum:
• Scheme is run in accordance with BS EN ISO 15257 – Cathodic protection. Competence levels and certification of cathodic protection personnel, and BS EN ISO/IEC 17024.
• the documents detailing the scheme, course material and exams, are up to date and fit for purpose.
• Document control to ensure latest versions are available for each course.
• Audit the syllabi, the course content, and the course delivery of CP courses.
• Audit both the technical content and process of the examinations.

The CPSM, additionally, coordinates course bookings, training centre availability and candidates, and ensures that the course work and examination material is delivered at the appropriate time and location, examinations are booked, completed, and marked, and the results are fed back to ensure that candidates then apply for their certification on time.

Nearly 20 CP courses were conducted, and 120 candidates attended these courses, in 2022.

The Scheme Manager also ensures that candidate feedback is regularly received by the CPGB as well as the tutors, as this is key to the success of CP courses.
The current CPGB Chair is Raju Narayan, and CP Scheme Managers, Eva and
Bill Whittaker.

ICATS/CORREX

ICATS/CORREX

Training
Dates for Trainer Training, Supervisor Training and Technical Manager Training will be put on the ICATS website after the planned Trainer Seminars (see below) being held at Corrosion Hous
in Northampton.

Seminars

We have not been in accordance with the current ICATS ReqDoc since and during Covid 19, for obvious reasons. However, with that situation currently resolved we will be holding an initial two seminars to on Tuesday 25th and Wednesday 26th of April at Corrosion House. Once we have a better idea of the number of attendees, we can increase the number of seminars being held.

Updates

During these seminars we will be informing you about updated courses, new courses, and much more. Trainers must attend one of our updates and of course company owners/managers/directors, and all interested parties, are all very welcome to listen to our very exciting story so far, and of course what we have been working on in the background. Emails will be sent out to the ICATS trainers for direct communication, plus we will also be put this information onto the ICATS website.

I look forward to seeing you all again, over this period.

Kevin Harold
CORREX Managing Director

New Members

New Members

Welcome to the 193 new members, 2 Sustaining Company members, and 3 Corporate members, who joined in 2022.

TOGETHER WITH THE CONGRATULATIONS of the Institute to all the following members who have attained Professional status in 2021.

TECHNICIAN
Sadiq Alshehab, Grant
William Wright

PROFESSIONAL
Jamshed Ahamad, Mohsin Behzad Ahmed, Adeleke Akinola, Ali Ahmed Almulla Azri Aziz, Sumedh Dayal, Victor Ime Dickson, Stephen Edgar, Venkateswaran Elangovan, Ahmed Magdy Mohammed Elsayed,Rajkumar Ganapathi, Olesia Gautsel, Veysi Helvaci, Alaaeldin Hikail, Damian Humphreys, Abdul Hakkim Nandankizhaya Jabbar, Nitin Jain, Stephen Harry Jarvis, Kashif Javeed, Nitin Jayaprakash, Stephen Jones, Mohamed Kamoura, Chaitanya Kumar Kanukula, David Kerr, Muhammad Ahmad Khan, Shamsh Tabrez Khan, David Christopher Lawson, Ramesh Manimuthu, Michel Cesar Mbadinga, Mohamed Mohfouz, Ali Mukhtiar, James Richard McGladdery, Yusuf Nasidi, Kelechi Osuoji, Steven William Pennock, Vijay Ramakrishna Perumal, Muhammad Usman Ali Qureshi, Shaik Rafithulla, Vishav Preet Singh Rana, Kannan Sadasivam, Eng Peng Seng, Rabik Raja Sha, Maged Fawzy Ahmed Shams, Muhammad Usman Shouk, Naved Tanveer, Lee Taylor, Muhammed Touheed, Ian Robert Tuck, Doruk Yilmaz

FELLOW
Brian Goldie, Kenneth Paul Griffiths, John Charles Norris, Eugene Ogosi, Padmanabhan Pavithran, Nigel Peterson-White, James Alexander Phipps, Jonathan A Segynola, Devi Selvakkannu, Maqsood Uz Zaman Temuri, David Shaw, Keith Martin Wagner, Richard Weare, Jonathan Wells, Rengeesh M Vijayan, Wo Yu-You

Carbon Capture and Storage: The Part That Corrosion Management Plays

Carbon Capture and Storage: The Part That Corrosion Management Plays

Corrosion Science and Engineering in Action in Climate Change Technology

Carbon capture and storage is a technology that could be crucial in our attempts to slow the effects of climate change. The methodology is relatively simple:

  • Carbon dioxide (CO2) is captured from power plants and industrial sources before it is released into the atmosphere.
  • Captured CO2 is then transported and stored underground in geological formations, such as depleted oil and gas reservoirs, deep saline aquifers, and coal seams that can no longer be mined.

This process can significantly reduce CO2 emissions released into the atmosphere from power generation and heavy industry.

However, the long-term storage of CO2 in underground reservoirs poses many technical challenges. One of these is corrosion management of the pipelines used to transport CO2.to carbon capture and storage (CCS) facilities.

Why corrosion management is crucial in carbon capture and transportation

Pipelines are often made of materials that are vulnerable to corrosion, and, if left under-managed, this can lead to various problems. For example, corrosion can cause equipment to leak or fail, potentially releasing the captured carbon dioxide into the environment.

Effective corrosion management helps to ensure the safe and reliable operation of the system, while also protecting the environment. By proactively managing corrosion, the efficiency and longevity of the system can be maintained, reducing the costs and potential risks associated with equipment failure – including the risks to the environment and human health.

Therefore, corrosion management should be considered as a crucial aspect of carbon capture and transportation systems.

What causes corrosion in CCS facilities and transportation?

Corrosion in CO2 pipelines is somewhat different from the conventional CO2 corrosion that occurs during the transportation of oil and gas. In these systems water mixed with oil is unavoidable – it’s in the ground with the oil. CO2 is also usually present in large quantities because oil and gas fields tend to contain CO2. During transportation, the CO2 dissolves in the water and acidifies it. This can lead to corrosion of the metallic material from which the pipeline is made.

With CCS on the other hand, we are normally transporting CO2 in its dense phase – either as a liquid or as a ‘supercritical’ fluid which is not quite a liquid and not quite a gas (a fluid with a mixture of the two properties). From a corrosion perspective, if we could ensure that we only have pure dense-phase CO2 in the pipeline (with no water or other impurities present), there would be no corrosion.

The corrosion problem exists because of the way in which the CO2 is produced before being delivered to the pipeline or other transportation system. For example, CO2 generated by the burning of a fossil fuel in a power station is captured in a solvent and later released from the solvent in a secondary step and pumped into the pipeline. Impurities are created during this process. Sulphur oxides, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulphide, and water can all be present. It’s the water that can initiate the corrosion problem.

How does corrosion occur in CCS transportation?

When water condenses in the pipeline, other impurities will dissolve in the water, as well as the CO2.

The presence of other impurities can increase the likelihood of corrosive phases forming, either by reducing the water solubility or via chemical reactions between different impurities,” explains Gareth Hinds of the National Physical Laboratory (NPL). “Acid dropout is the most significant concern for pipeline operators, whereby highly corrosive aqueous phases, such as nitric and sulphuric acid, can form as a result of reactions between water, NOx, SOx, O2 and H2S impurities.”

Corrosion Management Strategies in CCS Facilities

In oil and gas installations and transportation, corrosion is quite predictable. It can be managed with inhibitors, coatings and cathodic protection. It is not so straightforward in CCS facilities and pipelines.

In dense-phase CO2, the concern is the impurities. It is difficult to predict where these will condense, nor do we know what reactions will happen between the impurities.

In short, it is crucial to consider corrosion as a priority in both the design and operation of CCS pipelines. Any leak can lead to many issues, including potential loss of life where ground level CO2 concentration rises above 100,000 ppm.

Corrosion management in CCS transportation is largely concerned with specifying impurity limits at the inlet to the pipeline – and maintaining these for the life of the pipeline. Therefore, the industry must focus on ensuring impurities are kept within limits that don’t propagate bulk phase reactions and form aqueous phases.

The future of corrosion management in CCS facilities

As long ago as 2014, the Materials Performance magazine published an article discussing the pipeline corrosion issues related to carbon capture, transportation, and storage. It explored a range of potential advances in corrosion management in CCS, including:

  • Using sealants made from inorganic materials
  • Continuing research into the compatibility of non-metallic materials (polymers, ceramics, and plastics) in dense phase CO2 containing impurities
  • Evaluation and testing of suitable corrosion inhibitors

There has been much work into all such considerations, but the work is not yet concluded. Indeed, corrosion is such a complex subject that research and discovery is likely to have no end. Writing in Corrosion Management Magazine, Gareth Hinds notes some of the corrosion management issues that the CCS industry faces:

Assessment of the risk of water and acid dropout in CO2 pipelines due to the presence of multiple impurities is a complex process, which requires an understanding of the thermodynamics of fluid composition, the impact of operating temperature and pressure variations (including potential upset conditions) and interactions between impurities. The requirements for ship transport are typically more stringent than those for pipelines, with lowest temperatures representing the worst-case scenario.

Published corrosion rate data in the open literature should be treated with caution due to challenges in control of test parameters and the high degree of uncertainty around the correlation between laboratory test data and real-world application. Combined with the relative lack of service experience in transport of CO2 captured from a range of industrial sources, this often leads to a degree of over-conservatism in materials selection.

For CO2 specifications, thresholds in relation to acid drop out are set based on limited available data (often not lower than 25°C) and are therefore likely not conservative enough. The development of reliable standard test methods that are more representative of service conditions will go a long way towards addressing these issues.

The bottom line – It’s a question of delivering sustainability

There is no simple answer to managing corrosion in CCS facilities and pipelines more effectively. There are no internationally agreed specifications for CO2 composition during pipeline transport, despite general industry guidance on impurity limits. Currently, the responsibility lies with the pipeline operator.

The Institute of Corrosion is at the forefront of this conversation on the international stage. We understand that the corrosion industry – engineering and academia – has a great opportunity and responsibility to deliver the knowledge and solutions required to create a more sustainable planet.

The Institute of Corrosion, partnering with the North of England Institute of Mining and Mechanical Engineers, is hosting a not-to-be-missed conference on Integrity Engineering for a Sustainable Future. Delegates will have the opportunity to learn more about the advances being made in corrosion management across the energy industry, as well as networking with some of the most prominent experts involved in the corrosion conversation.

To learn more about how the Institute of Corrosion is helping to combat climate change, and how you can get involved, please email the Institute of Corrosion.

From the Editor

From the Editor

Welcome to the first issue of 2023, and as The President noted, my last issue as editor. It’s time to retire and relax in the sun, well south London anyway. I will work with the new editor, on the next issue, but it will be his decision as to what it contains.
This issue has the usual columns, with some very interesting articles in “Ask the Expert”, and “Fellow’s Corner” The technical articles cover maintenance painting in shipyards, with details of using a robot to increase productivity, and how the use of Big Data can improve pipeline integrity management. There is also a new column aimed at young engineers in our industry, and I would like to hear from readers if this should become a regular column.
I have enjoyed producing this magazine, and working in the industry, and wish all readers success in their careers.


Brian Goldie, Consulting Editor
Email: brianpce@aol.com