ICorr Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC) Training Course Plan for 2024.

The Institute of Corrosion (ICorr) is pleased to announce the plan for the MIC
training course for 2024. Both the Awareness and Certified MIC
Technologist proficiency levels are offered, at ICorr headquarters, twice next
year as follows;

April 2024:

  • Awareness (one day course) on the 29 April 2024
  • Certified MIC Technologist (5-day course) from the 29 April 2024 to 3 May 2024

November 2024:

  • Awareness (one day course) on the 11 November 2024
  • Certified MIC Technologist (5-day course) from the 11 November 2024 to 15 November 2024

An MIC Technologist attendance certificate is available for attending the 4-
day course without taking the certification exam.

Please contact admin@icorr.org for registration.

There are a number of hotels within a walking distance to ICorr offices including Ibis and Park Inn. It is recommended to make provisional booking
as early as possible to secure a competitive rate.

We look forward to seeing you.
The Institute of Corrosion

ICorr Coating Inspection Level 2 online

ICorr Coating Inspection Level 2 online

Course Overview

This ICorr Level 2 course is designed to equip inspectors with the necessary knowledge and skills to perform their role effectively in the coatings industry. Inspectors are expected to liaise between parties and observe surface preparation and coating activities.

This ICorr accredited course focuses on the responsibilities and duties of an inspector, and the importance of ensuring work is completed in accordance with specifications to obtain a high-quality paint job.

Course content

The training programme equips candidates with the necessary skills and knowledge to meet industry standards.

Key competencies covered in the course include:

Selecting the appropriate scope for inspection or testing within the framework of agreed procedures.
Choosing suitable inspection and test methods, while adhering to established procedures.
Effectively carrying out and supervising inspection or testing tasks.
Interpreting and evaluating results in line with relevant normative documents.
Defining the limitations of common test methods.
Translating normative document requirements into practical instructions tailored to real-world conditions.
Preparing written test instructions, specifically related to painting inspection.

 

Course details

Study time
ICorr Level 1 Corrodere Academy students
40 hours of online training followed by a 1-day online final examination.
New Corrodere Academy students
80 hours of online training followed by a 1-day online final examination.                                             

Certificate/Qualification
ICorr Level 2 Coating Inspector Certificate of Achievement, valid for 5 years.                                                        

Entry criteria
ICorr Level 1 Coating Inspection Certificate and 24 months of coating Inspection experience after Level 1 qualification.                                                 

Course fee

£1,275.00 – Course Fee
£175.00 – Online Exam Fee

Plus 20% VAT if applicable.

ICorr Insulation Inspector – Certificate of Achievement. Valid 5 years.

Course dates – Open registration with access to the training material for 12 months. Final examinations can be taken on a date and time to suit you.

Enrol herehttps://corrodere.com/courses/insulation-inspector/

Course and examination enquiries

For any questions or further enquiries, please visit our training partner’s website at www.corrodere.com, or alternatively, you can contact them at:

+44 (0) 1252 732236
Info@corrodere.com

Zinc Epoxy Primers: How Do You Select Which To Use?

Zinc Epoxy Primers: How Do You Select Which To Use?

Examining the Use of Low-Zinc Epoxy Primers

In an Ask the Expert Article in which a reader asks the question, “Do these (low-zinc) primers still provide good galvanic corrosion protection and maintain good adhesion and mechanical properties of the dried film?”, the answer includes the following explanation:

Formulation of an effective zinc-rich or reduced zinc primer requires a high degree of effort (or luck!) on the part of the formulator – it is not just a case of putting in a high loading of zinc and hoping for the best.”

When it comes to protective coatings, zinc epoxy primers are a critical component in safeguarding metal surfaces. These primers are renowned for their corrosion resistance and durability. But how do you know which is the correct one for your application?

Unpacking the Role of Zinc in Epoxy Primers

The efficacy of zinc in epoxy primers can’t be overstated. To truly appreciate its role, we need to delve into the chemistry and physics of how these primers work.

Zinc acts as a sacrificial anode. When applied over metal surfaces, it reacts preferentially with the oxygen and moisture in the environment, corroding itself instead of allowing the underlying metal to rust. This process, known as cathodic protection, is central to the protective qualities of epoxy primers.

But the role of zinc extends beyond just preventing rust. It also contributes significantly to the primer’s adhesion properties. The presence of zinc particles creates a rougher surface at a microscopic level. This increased surface roughness enhances the mechanical adhesion between the primer and the metal substrate, ensuring a stronger bond and a more durable protective layer.

Moreover, zinc contributes to the overall mechanical strength of the dried film. It helps in forming a dense, impermeable barrier that is resistant to scratches and impacts. This is particularly important in harsh industrial environments where mechanical wear and tear are common.

Furthermore, zinc’s role is not just limited to protection and adhesion. It also affects the primer’s electrical properties. Zinc-rich primers can provide a certain level of conductivity, which is beneficial in preventing static charge build-up on the surface. This property is particularly valuable in certain industrial applications where static electricity can pose a significant risk.

In essence, zinc is a multifaceted player in epoxy primers. Its contribution goes beyond mere surface-level protection, impacting the primer’s physical, chemical, and electrical properties. Understanding these aspects is crucial when considering the implications of reducing zinc levels in these formulations.

The Low-Down on Low Zinc Levels

The formulation of the primer plays a crucial role. The type and amount of zinc, the particle size, and the distribution of zinc within the epoxy matrix are all critical factors that influence the primer’s performance. Advanced formulations aim to optimise these factors to ensure maximum protection with minimum zinc content.

What exactly constitutes a ‘low zinc level’ in these primers? Typically, it refers to formulations where the zinc content is significantly reduced compared to traditional mixes.

Most standards and specifications require at least 77% of weight of zinc dust in dried film to meet the performance demands. For example, standards for zinc levels in coatings include:

  • ISO 12944 = “zinc rich” >80% (Zinc dust on dry film)
  • BS5493 = “zinc rich” >95% (Zinc dust on weight of pigment)
  • BS4652 = “zinc rich” >85% (Zinc metal on dry film)

However, protective primers are increasingly formulated using lower levels of zinc, with a process that ensures the zinc dust particles are not totally encased by the binder. This makes sure that the zinc is still able to react with the external environment.

The shift towards these low-zinc formulations is often driven by cost reduction, easier application processes, and environmental considerations.

Investigating Adhesion Properties

Zinc plays a pivotal role in ensuring that an epoxy primer adheres to metal surfaces. There’s a complex interplay of chemical and mechanical bonding that occurs, and zinc dust particles contribute to both:

  • Chemically, zinc can react with the metal surface, enhancing the bind between primer and metal
  • Mechanically, zinc particles create a rougher texture, which in turn provides greater grip and stronger adhesion

Tests are carried out to measure adhesive strength of low-zinc primers under different conditions, including exposure to moisture, temperature variations, and mechanical stress.

It’s also crucial to consider adhesion longevity, for over time environmental factors (like UV exposure, corrosion, and thermal cycling} can lead to degradation of adhesion. In this regard, zinc’s protective qualities can help to prolong a bond’s lifespan by shielding the metal surface from these elements.

We also need to consider how a primer is applied to a metal surface. Factors like surface preparation, primer thickness, and curing conditions can significantly affect the end result. ICorr’s Coating and Inspection courses ensure that applicators and inspectors understand the science behind effective use of zinc primers and use this knowledge effectively in the field.

We also need to remember that theoretical and real-world performance of coatings can vary dramatically. It’s crucial that we ensure feedback loops to inform research and innovation.

Exploring Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties of zinc epoxy primers are critical to their performance. The following aspects must be considered when formulating and using zinc epoxy primers:

·       Durability and Resistance to Wear

Zinc plays a pivotal role in a primer’s resistance to wear. Tests like Taber Abrasion and Impact Resistance provide crucial data that informs us of the durability of lower-zinc formulations.

·       Flexibility and Resistance to Cracking

Especially for structures that are subject to thermal expansion or mechanical stress, the flexibility of a primer is important. They must be able to flex without cracking or loss of adhesion. Here, we might look at studies on elasticity and tests of tensile strength of low-zinc primers when considering the ability to maintain integrity under stress.

·       Effect of Environmental Factors

Zinc has proactive qualities that contribute to shielding an underlying metal from environmental factors such as UV radiation, extreme temperatures, and corrosive environments. Therefore, it’s also crucial to assess how reduced zinc levels in a primer will affect performance in the environment in which the structure exists.

·       Resistance to Chemicals

Chemical resistance testing provides valuable insight into the suitability of low-zinc primers when they are required to resist the effects of chemicals, oils, and solvents – exactly the type of environment in which many industrial applications are needed.

In addition to the above, we also need to consider the correlation between adhesion and mechanical properties, and how zinc levels affect this.

Finally, when considering the use of lower-zinc epoxy primers, it’s crucial to include discussions about longevity and maintenance requirements. An analysis of primer performance over time – including consideration of repair needs – will help to assess overall cost effectiveness over the lifetime of the structure.

Navigating the Trade-Offs

Selecting the best zinc epoxy primer requires careful consideration of various factors. As we move toward lower-zinc formulations, we must consider the following trade-offs:

·       Balancing Cost and Performance

Do lower upfront costs offset potential increase in maintenance or a possible reduction in the longevity of the coating?

·       Environmental Considerations

Reducing zinc use can result in lower environmental impacts, reducing mining as an example. Reducing zinc levels can lower toxicity and improve working conditions. But are they sustainable?

·       Performance in Industry-Specific Conditions

Each industry has unique requirements. Maritime industries require primers to withstand harsh, moist and salt-heavy conditions. Onshore infrastructure may prioritise flexibility and UV resistance. We need to be certain that suitable primers are used for each unique need.

·       Innovations in Formulations

As our knowledge of how alternative compounds can complement the protective qualities of zinc, we have been able to develop new formulations that meet the dual demands of performance and sustainability.

·       Regulatory Compliance and Safety Standards

We need to consider current and updated regulations and compliance with international standards, as well as paying heed to health and safety requirements. Low-zinc primers must meet the same rigorous standards as traditional formulations.

·       Long-Term Implications and Lifecycle Analysis

Finally, it’s essential to consider the long-term implications of low-zinc primers. This includes a lifecycle analysis of the coating, considering factors like frequency of reapplication, ease of repair, and eventual disposal. Understanding the full lifecycle impact of these primers can provide a more comprehensive view of their cost-effectiveness and environmental footprint.

The Bottom Line for Low-Zinc Epoxy Primers

There are compelling arguments for the use of low-zinc epoxy primers. However, when doing so, we must consider a multitude of factors.

When considering the trade-offs, we must make informed decisions, balancing cost-effectiveness, environmental friendliness, and performance. Only then can we select solutions that align with needs, budgetary constraints, environmental responsibilities, and regulatory requirements.

We also need to remain updated with the evolution of innovations in this field, as academia and engineering collaborate to expand the capabilities and applications of corrosion prevention and protection products and techniques.

Do you work with coatings to protect metal from corrosion? If you’d like to know more about ICorr’s training schemes for applicators and inspectors, click on the following links:

Coating and Inspection Training

ICATS training

Institute Exhibited at Floating Offshore Wind (FOW) Expo 2023 (Conference & Exhibition)

Institute Exhibited at Floating Offshore Wind (FOW) Expo 2023 (Conference & Exhibition)

Initiated by Council and CP Governing Board member Brian Wyatt, the Institute exhibited at Floating Offshore Wind (FOW) Expo 2023 (Conference & Exhibition) on the 4th and 5th of October 2023. This unique operator and service provider event comprised around 100 Speakers, 200 Exhibitors and 2000+ high-level attendees from around the globe.

FOW is the meeting place for all the current and future players in the global floating wind industry. Providing an unrivalled opportunity to meet and network with all the key players as well as discuss the key technical challenges and solutions surrounding the industrialisation and commercialisation of floating wind.

ICorr’s participation was very successfully handled by the Aberdeen Branch and attracted a wide range of stand visitors. The key focus for this event was our Training Services:

Industrial Coating Applicator Scheme (ICATS), ICorr’s Cathodic Protection Technician and Engineer Training, Certification to ISO 15257 and Coating Inspector courses that promote independent reporting to facility owners (as now required in ISO 24656 and in DNV-RP-B401 for their Cat IV coating). The highest levels of competency, specification, and performance assessment at all stages from design onwards are essential to maximising FOW equipment life, with operators now seeking up to 35-year lifespans.

In the cathodic protection sector, initial offshore renewables structures were designed to RP-B401 which provides good guidance for conventional fixed jackets, but is considered inadequate for monopiles or floating turbines. Latest available standards however, (the improved) RP-B401 and (the new) ISO 24656 require design by a competent, experienced CP Engineer/Expert (and Level 4 certification to ISO 15257 is the best measure, noted by both DNV and ISO).

One of the key objectives of our participation was to help drive quality throughout the FOW Industry. ICATS and ICorr’s presence at the Expo resulted in more than 60 high quality leads and around half of these were enquiries related to our existing – ‘Training Services’ and others requesting new courses specifically covering the updated RP-B401 – 2021 and (the new) ISO 24656 – 2022 standards. The event provided excellent FOW Industry engagement and neatly followed our very well attended North-East branch sustainability conference. North East Branch – Institute of Corrosion (icorr.org) refers to the Local Technical Programme – 2023 Presentations.

CAPTIONS:

ICorr Council and CP Governing board member Brian Wyatt at CEOCOR (pictured at CEOCOR).

Floating Offshore Wind (FOW) Exhibition – ICATS and ICorr Joint Stand.

ICorr Stand Representatives – Yunnan Gao (Vice President), Adesiji Anjorin (ABZ Chair) and Stephen Tate (President) and Beh Lian Ling (ABZ Internal Secretary) Inset.

FOW Exhibition – Overview of Stands.

FOW Exhibition – Reception Area.

Corrosion Engineering Division

Corrosion Engineering Division

Roger Francis:
Paul McIntyre Award Winner, 2023

The winner of the 2023 Paul McIntyre Award was Dr. Roger Francis and presented at this year’s Corrosion Engineering Division’s (CED) Working Day and Symposium held at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) in Teddington on 27th April 2023. Further details of this Event may be found in the May/June issue of Corrosion Management.

Roger is a well-established Corrosion Engineer with a specialist interest in copper and its alloys and in CRAs. He has been very active in Marine Corrosion (MFC) Forums and the European Federation of Corrosion (EFC) working parties, particularly in developing standards throughout his career making him a very well qualified recipient of this award. Roger gave a brief paean to Paul in which he talked about their collaboration in standards work back in the 80s and 90s.

Rogers Background in His Own Words:
“After leaving Manchester University with a fresh PhD from the Metallurgy Department of Manchester University, I started as a very junior research scientist at BNF Metals Technology Centre (nothing to do with BNFL). I was very lucky to be working for two scientists with international reputations, Hector Campbell and Vic Lucey. They taught me a lot and introduced me to colleagues from all over the world. I was mostly working on marine corrosion
and other corrosion problems with copper alloys, particularly heat exchangers and pumps, although we got involved with other alloys. In the 1980’s I started testing of the new high alloy stainless steel in seawater. After 17 years at BNF I was head of the corrosion and protection department and looking for a new challenge.

I took up a post with the Weir Group in Manchester, evaluating the corrosion resistance of their new super duplex alloy ZERON 100. In addition, I found myself working with the pump group on failure analysis and selecting materials for pumps for aggressive environments of all sorts. I also found my services being requested by other parts of the Weir Group, such as desalination and materials handling, to look at failures and select materials. This involved a lot of foreign travel, which I enjoyed, and it enabled me to meet engineers from all over the globe. I am still in touch with some of these today.

One of the advantages of duplex stainless steels is their versatility, and I was always being asked to test duplex alloys in unusual and aggressive environments. These included flue gas desulphurisation (FGD), seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) desalination, acid-leach mining, and hot concentrated sulphuric acid. Super duplex stainless steel performed well in these environments, and the test data was accepted to justify its use, such that it is now the standard alloy for some of these applications.

In 2008 Weir sold the Manchester operation to Rolled Alloys and I found myself spending even more time travelling and supporting worldwide sales. I was also continuing corrosion testing in aggressive environments, and evaluating new alloys, such as lean duplex. Finally in 2012 I retired and set up my own consulting business RF Materials. After the initial launch I have never advertised, as work seems to come in all the time. This is mostly failure analysis or materials selection.

While working at BNF, I was a member of the IOM Corrosion Committee, along with Paul McIntyre. Together, we organised a series of one day seminars on various aspects of localised corrosion. I enjoyed working with Paul, with his perpetual politeness and dry sense of humour. He encouraged me to get involved in EFC activities, which I did when working for Weir, in both the marine and oil and gas working parties. For the EFC I jointly edited, with Carol Powell, a basic guide to metallic corrosion in marine environments, for young engineers, and it continues to sell well. In the oil and gas working party I attended numerous meetings when we were writing EFC 17 (the use of CRA’s in sour environments), and I drafted some of the sub-sections. This document is still widely referenced today despite being over 20 years old.

In other standards work I was consulted on the update of ISO 6509 (testing for resistance to dezincification). I was also heavily involved in the development of ISO 15156 part 3 (CRA) from NACE MR0175 (The limits of use of metals in sour environments). This was a complicated exercise, because of the desire to list alloys in groups rather than individually, as in the NACE document. I was also vice chair of the NACE International (now AMPP) committee in charge of TM 0198 (SSRT) from 2013 to 2019, when we included improved practices and methods of data analysis, many of which have subsequently been adopted into ISO 7539-7.

In the 1990’s, I realised I had learned a lot from senior engineers, but they had rarely put their knowledge and experiences in to print. I decided that I would try to record some of my useful experiences and knowledge for junior engineers. My first book, on galvanic corrosion, appeared in 2001 and continues to be a NACE International best seller over 20 years later. I have written five other books on a range of corrosion topics, and a sixth is in production, all published by NACE International. I have co-written two other books, one for MTI with Dale McIntyre on stress corrosion cracking and its prevention in the chemical and process industries. In 2014, I was awarded the T J Hull prize by NACE International for my work in publications. I continue to give technical presentations, seminars and training sessions, many aimed at younger engineers, some of these under the auspices of the Nickel Institute. An example is the use of stainless steels in the UK water industry, which I have done for the past three years for the Nickel Institute.

One rewarding factor is the number of younger engineers who have come up to me at conferences and said how useful they find one of my books. A disappointing side is the number of failures I am asked to investigate that are due to poor materials selection, when the knowledge of the correct alloys has been available for decades. A good example is the misguided use of 2205 duplex stainless steel in seawater, and the surprise when it suffers crevice corrosion. Because of things like this I realise that I will need to go on lecturing about materials selection for quite a bit longer.”

Clearly, Roger has had a very impressive career and is a worthy winner for the Paul McIntyre award.

If you know a colleague who fills the criteria for the Paul McIntyre award, then please send their name, email, and justification for being nominated to
danny.burkle@lbbcbaskerville.co.uk

You can find more information on the assessment criteria here:

CAPTION:

Stephen Tate (ICorr President), with Roger Francis (Paul McIntyre Award Winner).