Young Engineer Programme 2024: Launched and Off to a Successful Start

Young Engineer Programme 2024: Launched and Off to a Successful Start

YEP 2024 Sprints Out of the Blocks

Standing at the forefront of the corrosion industry, the Institute of Corrosion understands the critical nature of preparing the next generation of corrosion engineers to tackle the significant challenges and threats that corrosion poses to the world’s infrastructure and economy. Which is why we are delighted to announce the launch of the Young Engineer Programme (YEP) 2024.

In this year’s programme, we’re building on the success of previous years. Coordinated and managed by Young ICorr for the first time, YEP 2024 promises to be an even more enriching and transformative journey for aspiring corrosion professionals.

Young Engineer Programme 2024: Key Takeaways

  • YEP is meticulously designed to cover the spectrum of corrosion management, from the fundamentals of corrosion to the intricacies of materials selection, integrity management, and beyond.
  • The curriculum is structured to ensure participants gain not just theoretical knowledge, but also hands-on experience through real-life case studies and team projects.
  • As in previous years, perhaps the most exciting aspect of this year’s YEP is the real-life case study challenge, where participants will apply their learning to solve actual corrosion problems, culminating in a presentation to a panel of judges.
  • The winning team will be awarded an all-expenses-paid trip to the AMPP 2025 Conference in Nashville, USA, confirming ICorr’s commitment to rewarding excellence and innovation.

YEP 2024 – Kicking Off in London

YEP 2024 kick-started with an inaugural event in London, marking a momentous beginning to a year-long journey dedicated to nurturing tomorrow’s corrosion management experts.

This event wasn’t simply a formal introduction to the programme. It was a vibrant gathering of passionate individuals, including the selected participants, esteemed ICorr members, and distinguished speakers from the corrosion community.

Meet the Participants

This year, we’re thrilled to welcome twenty-six early-career professionals from diverse backgrounds, including engineering, science, and research, all sharing a common goal: to excel in the field of corrosion.

Representing a broad spectrum of companies and academic institutions, they bring a wealth of perspectives and a shared eagerness to dive deep into the world of corrosion. Their diversity is not just in their professional backgrounds but also in their aspirations, with each looking forward to contributing to and benefitting from this unique learning experience.

Drum roll, please, as we bring this year’s YEP participants on stage!

  • Alvaro Gonzalez Fuentes, Wood Thilsted
  • Alyshia Keogh, University of Manchester
  • Amy Johnstone, Kent PLC
  • Ben Hudson, Premtech
  • Berenika Syrek-Gerstenkorn, Scottish Power
  • Christina Igube, C-Probe Systems
  • Clayton Bevas, Jacobs
  • Dilshad Shaikhah, University of Leeds
  • Ellie Lowe, DNV
  • Fatima Mehnoune, Intertek CAPCIS
  • Georgie Bond, Johnson Matthey
  • Joe Linkson, Wood Thilsted
  • Katie Atkins, Johnson Matthey
  • Kevin Lam, bp
  • Kishan Ramesh, Plant Integrity Management
  • Lukasz Ramowski, Saipem
  • Mohammed Muqueeth, Plant Integrity Management
  • Muhammad Haris, Brunel University
  • Noor Ghadarah, Saipem
  • Roberto Alcivar, vHPM UK
  • Rochelle Holness, Genesis Energies
  • Roisin Harris, Ramboll
  • Samuel Brown, Wood PLC
  • Tom Robinson, Saith Ltd
  • William Adu-Poku, Altrad Babcock
  • Yulia Sergeykina, BP

YEP 2024: The Year Ahead

As the participants embark on their journey, YEP 2024 will unfold over the rest of the year with a series of evening lectures and workshops. Oh, and, of course, the eagerly anticipated case study project.

Each session is an opportunity for participants to learn from and interact with experts in the field, developing not just their technical skills but also their professional network, as YEP 2024 covers topics that include:

Date Topic of Event / Workshop
Jan 2024 Fundamentals of Corrosion
Feb 2024 Materials / Welding
Mar 2024 NDT & Corrosion Monitoring
Apr 2024 Coatings & Linings
May 2024 Previous Case Study / Delivery of Case Study to the Teams
Jun 2024 Corrosion under Insulation / Fire Proofing
Jul 2024 Cathodic Protection
Aug 2024 Production Chemistry / Chemical Treatments
Aug 2024 Annual Corrosion Forum – Energy Transition (Free space for YEP)
Sep 2024 Integrity Management / Fitness For Service
Oct 2024 Presentation Skills
Nov 2024 Presentations of Case Study

 

Let the Battle Begin!

Toward the end of the programme, a pivotal moment awaits our participants: the case study presentation. Each event, workshop, and talk is leading to this test of knowledge and chance to showcase innovation, teamwork, and the ability to apply theoretical learning to real-world corrosion challenges.

Having delved deep into the case study, each team will stand before a panel of judges to present their findings and proposed solutions. This culmination of months of hard work, learning and collaboration is a high-stakes affair – the winning team will not only earn the accolade of their peers, but also be rewarded with an all-expenses-paid trip to the AMPP 2025 Conference in Nashville, USA.

YEP 2024 Is an Event for All Corrosion Professionals

While we must strictly limit the number of participants in YEP, this doesn’t mean you can’t follow along! Indeed, we welcome the wider corrosion community to support this invaluable initiative.

Whether you’re a seasoned professional or someone with a budding interest in corrosion management, there’s much to learn and share.

Please, feel free to engage with the Institute of Corrosion and YEP 2024 through our events, as well as our updates on the ICorr blog and social media, and consider how you might contribute to or benefit from ICorr’s initiatives.

Don’t forget, if you’re interested in diving deeper into the topics covered by the YEP or learning more about corrosion management, visit the ICorr website for a wealth of resources, including publications, upcoming events, and membership information.

YEP 2024: A Final Word from Young ICorr

We couldn’t close this article without hearing from the Young ICorr committee. Izabela Gajewska, MICorr, Corrosion & Integrity Engineer at Intertek CAPCIS told us:

It was great to finally meet the successful YEP 2024 candidates from various engineering companies across the UK in person! They all seemed to be as enthusiastic about the programme as we are!

We’re delighted to have such a group of participants in this year’s YEP. I can’t wait to get going in earnest, and witness how the programme decreases the gap in knowledge between junior and senior engineers!

As ever, we would like to extend special thanks to our generous YEP sponsors, AMPP: Association for Materials Protection and PerformanceBP and Wood Thilsted (Anthony Setiadi), and also to the speakers at the launch event: ICorr President Stephen Tate, Dr Jane Lomas, and ICorr Corrosion Engineering Division Chair / YEP Committee Dr Danny Burkle.

Welcome to the Wales and South-West Regional Branch of ICorr

Welcome to the Wales and South-West Regional Branch of ICorr

A New Regional Branch to See in the New Year

The turn of the year saw the first of what we hope will be several exciting regional branch announcements this year: we’re thrilled to introduce a significant addition to the Institute of Corrosion (ICorr) family – the Wales and South-West Regional Branch.

This new regional branch is set to host its inaugural event and Annual General Meeting (AGM) on 21st March 2024, marking a significant milestone in our continuous effort to expand our reach and impact across the UK. You’re all welcome to attend – read on for more information.

Reaching Out to a Region of Diverse Industries

The Wales and South-West region is home to a diverse range of business sectors, from aerospace, chemical plants, and construction products to energy production, inspection and analytical services, oil and gas, petrochemicals, renewables, and steel and metal manufacturing/recycling.

This diversity not only underlines the economic vibrancy of the region, but also highlights the need for greater knowledge, experience, and collaboration to overcome the complex corrosion challenges that these industries face.

In recognition of this, the Wales and South-West Regional Branch has been established with a clear mandate to develop and share knowledge regarding corrosion and its prevention, fostering a collaborative environment that brings together industry and academia.

Uniting Industry and Academia

The branch is also ideally positioned to bridge the gap between the region’s diverse industries and leading universities. This synergy is aimed at not only sharing existing knowledge, but also sparking new ideas and innovation for corrosion prevention. By doing so, the branch is set to become a pivotal force in both the practical and creative aspects of corrosion management.

A Focus on Future Engineers

A crucial aspect of the regional branch’s mission is the development of future generations of corrosion and materials engineers.

Through targeted presentations from industry professionals and academics, the branch aims to address local industry needs and challenges within the broad subject of corrosion. Moreover, the branch is committed to promoting learning and sharing experiences among experts within the region, thereby enriching the professional community.

Yearly Programme of Events

The branch has ambitious plans to define a yearly programme of events that includes:

  • Meetings
  • Guest visits
  • Speakers
  • Workshops
  • Roadshows

Not only will these present ideal opportunities for industry professionals to broaden and deepen their professional networks, but we also aim to engage undergraduates, schools, apprenticeship programs and colleges, in our goal to encourage interest in corrosion and its prevention from a wide audience.

Your Invitation to the Inaugural Event and AGM

The first official event and inaugural AGM promises to be a landmark occasion. Scheduled for 21st March from 12 pm to 2 pm with lunch provided, the event will feature presentations on Microbiologically Induced Corrosion – a critical topic given its impact across several sectors represented in the region.

Speakers include Director of Consultancy Services at R-TECH Sarah Bagnall and Dr Gareth Williams, Consultancy Services Manager of ECHA Microbiology, whose insights will be invaluable.

The event will also include a laboratory tour, providing attendees with a unique opportunity to see corrosion science in action.

Register Now to Join Us

Located at R-TECH Materials, Testing House, Kenfig Industrial Estate, Margam, Port Talbot, SA13 2PE, this event is not to be missed.

Registration will close on Monday, 18th March.

If you are interested in attending or becoming part of this forward-looking and vibrant new regional branch, please reach out to us at swchair@icorr.org for further information.

A Note from the ICorr President

ICorr President Stephen Tate is enthusiastic for the future of this new branch, saying, “The establishment of the Wales and South-West Regional Branch of ICorr is a testament to our commitment to advancing the field of corrosion science and engineering.

Through this new branch, we look forward to fostering a community of professionals and academics who are dedicated to tackling corrosion challenges and contributing to the sustainable development of the region’s industries. I’m convinced that its membership will be instrumental in making a lasting impact in the field of corrosion prevention.”

Zinc Epoxy Primers: How Do You Select Which To Use?

Zinc Epoxy Primers: How Do You Select Which To Use?

Examining the Use of Low-Zinc Epoxy Primers

In an Ask the Expert Article in which a reader asks the question, “Do these (low-zinc) primers still provide good galvanic corrosion protection and maintain good adhesion and mechanical properties of the dried film?”, the answer includes the following explanation:

Formulation of an effective zinc-rich or reduced zinc primer requires a high degree of effort (or luck!) on the part of the formulator – it is not just a case of putting in a high loading of zinc and hoping for the best.”

When it comes to protective coatings, zinc epoxy primers are a critical component in safeguarding metal surfaces. These primers are renowned for their corrosion resistance and durability. But how do you know which is the correct one for your application?

Unpacking the Role of Zinc in Epoxy Primers

The efficacy of zinc in epoxy primers can’t be overstated. To truly appreciate its role, we need to delve into the chemistry and physics of how these primers work.

Zinc acts as a sacrificial anode. When applied over metal surfaces, it reacts preferentially with the oxygen and moisture in the environment, corroding itself instead of allowing the underlying metal to rust. This process, known as cathodic protection, is central to the protective qualities of epoxy primers.

But the role of zinc extends beyond just preventing rust. It also contributes significantly to the primer’s adhesion properties. The presence of zinc particles creates a rougher surface at a microscopic level. This increased surface roughness enhances the mechanical adhesion between the primer and the metal substrate, ensuring a stronger bond and a more durable protective layer.

Moreover, zinc contributes to the overall mechanical strength of the dried film. It helps in forming a dense, impermeable barrier that is resistant to scratches and impacts. This is particularly important in harsh industrial environments where mechanical wear and tear are common.

Furthermore, zinc’s role is not just limited to protection and adhesion. It also affects the primer’s electrical properties. Zinc-rich primers can provide a certain level of conductivity, which is beneficial in preventing static charge build-up on the surface. This property is particularly valuable in certain industrial applications where static electricity can pose a significant risk.

In essence, zinc is a multifaceted player in epoxy primers. Its contribution goes beyond mere surface-level protection, impacting the primer’s physical, chemical, and electrical properties. Understanding these aspects is crucial when considering the implications of reducing zinc levels in these formulations.

The Low-Down on Low Zinc Levels

The formulation of the primer plays a crucial role. The type and amount of zinc, the particle size, and the distribution of zinc within the epoxy matrix are all critical factors that influence the primer’s performance. Advanced formulations aim to optimise these factors to ensure maximum protection with minimum zinc content.

What exactly constitutes a ‘low zinc level’ in these primers? Typically, it refers to formulations where the zinc content is significantly reduced compared to traditional mixes.

Most standards and specifications require at least 77% of weight of zinc dust in dried film to meet the performance demands. For example, standards for zinc levels in coatings include:

  • ISO 12944 = “zinc rich” >80% (Zinc dust on dry film)
  • BS5493 = “zinc rich” >95% (Zinc dust on weight of pigment)
  • BS4652 = “zinc rich” >85% (Zinc metal on dry film)

However, protective primers are increasingly formulated using lower levels of zinc, with a process that ensures the zinc dust particles are not totally encased by the binder. This makes sure that the zinc is still able to react with the external environment.

The shift towards these low-zinc formulations is often driven by cost reduction, easier application processes, and environmental considerations.

Investigating Adhesion Properties

Zinc plays a pivotal role in ensuring that an epoxy primer adheres to metal surfaces. There’s a complex interplay of chemical and mechanical bonding that occurs, and zinc dust particles contribute to both:

  • Chemically, zinc can react with the metal surface, enhancing the bind between primer and metal
  • Mechanically, zinc particles create a rougher texture, which in turn provides greater grip and stronger adhesion

Tests are carried out to measure adhesive strength of low-zinc primers under different conditions, including exposure to moisture, temperature variations, and mechanical stress.

It’s also crucial to consider adhesion longevity, for over time environmental factors (like UV exposure, corrosion, and thermal cycling} can lead to degradation of adhesion. In this regard, zinc’s protective qualities can help to prolong a bond’s lifespan by shielding the metal surface from these elements.

We also need to consider how a primer is applied to a metal surface. Factors like surface preparation, primer thickness, and curing conditions can significantly affect the end result. ICorr’s Coating and Inspection courses ensure that applicators and inspectors understand the science behind effective use of zinc primers and use this knowledge effectively in the field.

We also need to remember that theoretical and real-world performance of coatings can vary dramatically. It’s crucial that we ensure feedback loops to inform research and innovation.

Exploring Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties of zinc epoxy primers are critical to their performance. The following aspects must be considered when formulating and using zinc epoxy primers:

·       Durability and Resistance to Wear

Zinc plays a pivotal role in a primer’s resistance to wear. Tests like Taber Abrasion and Impact Resistance provide crucial data that informs us of the durability of lower-zinc formulations.

·       Flexibility and Resistance to Cracking

Especially for structures that are subject to thermal expansion or mechanical stress, the flexibility of a primer is important. They must be able to flex without cracking or loss of adhesion. Here, we might look at studies on elasticity and tests of tensile strength of low-zinc primers when considering the ability to maintain integrity under stress.

·       Effect of Environmental Factors

Zinc has proactive qualities that contribute to shielding an underlying metal from environmental factors such as UV radiation, extreme temperatures, and corrosive environments. Therefore, it’s also crucial to assess how reduced zinc levels in a primer will affect performance in the environment in which the structure exists.

·       Resistance to Chemicals

Chemical resistance testing provides valuable insight into the suitability of low-zinc primers when they are required to resist the effects of chemicals, oils, and solvents – exactly the type of environment in which many industrial applications are needed.

In addition to the above, we also need to consider the correlation between adhesion and mechanical properties, and how zinc levels affect this.

Finally, when considering the use of lower-zinc epoxy primers, it’s crucial to include discussions about longevity and maintenance requirements. An analysis of primer performance over time – including consideration of repair needs – will help to assess overall cost effectiveness over the lifetime of the structure.

Navigating the Trade-Offs

Selecting the best zinc epoxy primer requires careful consideration of various factors. As we move toward lower-zinc formulations, we must consider the following trade-offs:

·       Balancing Cost and Performance

Do lower upfront costs offset potential increase in maintenance or a possible reduction in the longevity of the coating?

·       Environmental Considerations

Reducing zinc use can result in lower environmental impacts, reducing mining as an example. Reducing zinc levels can lower toxicity and improve working conditions. But are they sustainable?

·       Performance in Industry-Specific Conditions

Each industry has unique requirements. Maritime industries require primers to withstand harsh, moist and salt-heavy conditions. Onshore infrastructure may prioritise flexibility and UV resistance. We need to be certain that suitable primers are used for each unique need.

·       Innovations in Formulations

As our knowledge of how alternative compounds can complement the protective qualities of zinc, we have been able to develop new formulations that meet the dual demands of performance and sustainability.

·       Regulatory Compliance and Safety Standards

We need to consider current and updated regulations and compliance with international standards, as well as paying heed to health and safety requirements. Low-zinc primers must meet the same rigorous standards as traditional formulations.

·       Long-Term Implications and Lifecycle Analysis

Finally, it’s essential to consider the long-term implications of low-zinc primers. This includes a lifecycle analysis of the coating, considering factors like frequency of reapplication, ease of repair, and eventual disposal. Understanding the full lifecycle impact of these primers can provide a more comprehensive view of their cost-effectiveness and environmental footprint.

The Bottom Line for Low-Zinc Epoxy Primers

There are compelling arguments for the use of low-zinc epoxy primers. However, when doing so, we must consider a multitude of factors.

When considering the trade-offs, we must make informed decisions, balancing cost-effectiveness, environmental friendliness, and performance. Only then can we select solutions that align with needs, budgetary constraints, environmental responsibilities, and regulatory requirements.

We also need to remain updated with the evolution of innovations in this field, as academia and engineering collaborate to expand the capabilities and applications of corrosion prevention and protection products and techniques.

Do you work with coatings to protect metal from corrosion? If you’d like to know more about ICorr’s training schemes for applicators and inspectors, click on the following links:

Coating and Inspection Training

ICATS training

Standards Development in Cathodic Protection: Have Your Say

Standards Development in Cathodic Protection: Have Your Say

Developing ISO/DIS 9351 for Galvanic Anodes for CP in Seawater and Saline Sediments

An expert group of corrosion and cathodic protection practitioners from around the world have been busy collaborating in developing a new standard for Galvanic Anodes for CP in Seawater and Saline Sediments.

As Chief Corrosion Engineer with European Energy Birit Buhr says, “After intensive work from the truly global working group under ISO TC 156 WG10 jointly with CEN TC219 WG3, we now have a Draft International Standard (DIS) out for comments.

In this article, and with the help of Brian Wyatt, Director of Corrosion Control Ltd., certificated to Level 5 in accordance with ISO 15257 by ICorr, we discuss why there was a need for a new standard, the process involved, and how you can now have your say on the final international standard that will emerge from all the work done to date.

The Why of ISO/DIS 9351

BS EN ISO 9351 has been developed from BS EN 12496.

Many people from outside Europe who were involved in ISO 15589-2 (with the snappy title of ‘Oil and gas industries including lower carbon energy — Cathodic protection of pipeline transportation systems — Part 2: Offshore pipelines’) specifically requested that a new international standard be developed to provide greater availability globally,” says Brian. There was also pressure from within the experts preparing BS EN ISO 24656:2022 ‘Cathodic protection of offshore wind structures’ for this development.

The Process of Developing Standards in the Corrosion Industry

Developing standards is never a simple process. It’s not a straightforward renaming or cut-and-paste exercise. ISO says that the process from first proposal to final publication takes an average of three years, and likens it to a symphony, in which many people work together to develop a standard with ISO in the role of conductor.

The first crucial step in developing standards is to create a group of technical experts nominated by National Standards bodies. It is this team that then takes on the responsibility of creating a draft standard that meets the market need and is technically secure.

From EN 12496 to What We Hope Will become EN ISO 9351

Under the guidance of project manager Birit Buhr, a global team of experts has taken the bull by the horns, and shared their expertise to develop the new standard from the good start provided by EN 12496.

The outcome of this parallel work by ISO and CEN is a significant improvement from what is currently EN 12496 to this final comment stage, DIS, of what will become EN ISO 9351,” says Brian.

There are some significant changes from EN 12496, which can be summarised as follows:

  • Removal of some ambiguities in the definitions and permitted limits on physical properties
  • Ensuring convergence of data and properties between this galvanic anode standard and the important ISO DIS 15589-2 (which is also out for vote now)
  • Updated and increased range of aluminium anode alloys reflecting developments and needs
  • Greater clarity on the known variations in magnesium anode alloy performance
  • More extensive requirements and advice in respect of anode performance testing
  • More extensive references to support the above data
  • A new chapter, supported by Annex E, on environmental impacts providing guidance and recommendations

The new standard also provides greater clarity in respect of performance variations within the generic composition limits and that optimum performance, in particular for aluminium alloys, may not be delivered within the entire generic alloy range,” explains Brian.

For clarity, this is likely to mean that if a purchaser states they wish their supplier to deliver, say, alloy A2 and they expect to get the performance in the standard for any composition within the limits given in the standard, they may be disappointed.

Optimised alloys, within the range but with tighter limits than the range, are required to deliver the optimum performance. Often these alloys will have been subject to patent protection, following extensive testing by their international developer – and the manufacturers may have kept (and may still keep) the production compositions confidential.”

The Standard also contributes to several Sustainable Development Goals, notably:

  • Affordable and Clean Energy
  • Decent Work and Economic Growth
  • Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  • Responsible Consumption and Production
  • Climate Action

You Are Important in Developing Standards for the Corrosion Industry

The proposed Standard will set basic requirements and give advice for the chemical makeup, electrochemical characteristics, size accuracy, and methods for testing and inspecting cast galvanic anodes made from aluminium, magnesium, and zinc alloys for use in marine applications.

These anodes are used for cathodic protection in sea water and saline sediments, and the proposed Standard covers most types of galvanic anodes used in these environments, specifically cast anodes of trapezoidal, ‘D’, circular cross-section, and bracelet types. It might also apply to other anode shapes like half-spherical or button, which are occasionally used in sea water.

This Standard will be relevant for offshore renewable energy, flood defences, offshore oil and gas industries, submarine pipelines, ports, harbours, ships, and any other situation where galvanic anodes are used for corrosion protection in sea water and saline sediments.

Developing this Standard has been a joint effort between ISO TC 156 WG 10 and CEN TC 219 WG3, led by ISO as per the Vienna Convention between ISO and EN.

With the scope agreed by both parties, and the Draft International Standard written, all those who use the current applicable Standards in their work – and those with expertise in the manufacture and design/use of galvanic anodes in marine applications – are invited to comment on the proposed Standard through their National Standards body (e.g. BSI, AFNOR, SA, DS, AFNOR, DIN, UNI, JSA, SN, ANSI, etc. – we apologise to all key bodies we have not mentioned here).

You can access the full ISO/DIS 9351 either through your national body, or via the ISO portal here.

The official deadline for comments on this standard is 5th January 2024. However, national deadlines will expire before this – so check with your national body when your comments must be entered to them.

Before You Comment on ISO/DIS 9351, Take Note!

Within the Draft Standard, there is a compilation error in Table C.1.2. This error will be corrected by the Task Group when all comments and votes have been placed and received, for the table to read as follows:

Table C.1.2 — Typical properties of aluminium anodes in normal operation conditions

This is your industry. We urge you to get involved.

Meet the Corrosion Specialist: Ben Lee

Meet the Corrosion Specialist: Ben Lee

11 Questions in 11 Minutes

We’ve introduced a few corrosion specialists via our blog in recent months. In this article, we’re talking to one of the leading lights in Young ICorr – Ben Lee.

Here are the 11 questions we posed in the 11 minutes we took of Ben’s valuable time.

1.     Can you tell us a little about yourself, your background, and what made you enter the corrosion industry?

In the years after leaving school, I worked several jobs in banking and retail. In my late 20s, I decided that I needed to build a career in an industry that I might actually enjoy. So, I started to apply for apprenticeships. I was 29 years old (a late developer!).

I was successful in getting into SGN (previously Southern Gas Networks) as a Pipelines Apprentice, helping to look after and maintain the High-Pressure Transmission Network.

2.     What are some of the most significant challenges you’ve faced in your career to date, and how have you overcome them?

My three-year apprenticeship included a Business and Technology Education Council (BTEC) in Mechanical Engineering, which meant a lot of theoretical learning.

I was 31 at this stage, and so had been out of education for 15 years. That’s a long time to be out of the classroom – and while at school, no one would have considered me as being particularly academic.

The answer to this was to work hard, put in a lot of effort, and find ways to get my head around the things I was required to learn.

3.     What skills or traits do you believe are most crucial for someone to thrive in the corrosion industry?

I think you need to be willing to learn from your peers, regardless of their age or time in the job. You need to be able to think outside the box and have a good ability to problem solve, sometimes under tough conditions.

4.     How would you describe your role within the Institute of Corrosion to someone unfamiliar with it?

I’m on the Committee of Young ICorr (YICorr), attending events and being involved with this dynamic section. My favourite part of the role is helping others. It’s satisfying to be able to give back to an organisation that has given me so much, and I’m hopeful that my role will expand further in the near future.

 

5.     What inspired you to become involved in Young ICorr?

Since attending the ICORR Young Engineer Programme (YEP) in 2020, I have tried to be an advocate for people without a college or university education.

You see, I left school with four GCSEs and no idea what I wanted to do. I have found a job I really enjoy and believe in now. I want to share my experiences with others, to help them understand that you don’t have to have a higher education to be able to do well in this industry.

As long as you have the belief in yourself and are willing to learn, it’s an industry in which you can enjoy a great career, and in which you get to meet loads of great people along the way.

6.     Young ICorr has a tremendous focus on continuing education. In your opinion, why is continuing education crucial for corrosion scientists and engineers, especially those in the first few years of their career?

There is a huge amount to learn, and with an ever-growing understanding of the corrosion industry, alongside new technologies being developed and a world moving more towards sustainable energy, there will inevitably be a need to learn new things.

If you continually learn and develop, then you can progress in your career and take advantage of your growing knowledge and capability as the industry evolves.

7.     Looking ahead, what are your main goals and aspirations for your career over the next few years?

I want to continue to develop my understanding of the industry, and would like to start moving towards the design and development area. I want to keep building my network of corrosion professionals and keep learning as much as I can.

8.     And for Young ICorr – what are your aspirations for this part of the Institute of Corrosion?

I want to see ICorr grow and help Young ICorr to bring new people into the industry, including by letting people at school and college levels learn about the corrosion industry and the career opportunities it can provide.

9.     What has been your most significant learning or personal growth experience since joining the Institute of Corrosion and Young ICorr?

I have learned to have more self-belief.

I had a lot of ‘imposter syndrome’ when I started the YICorr programme – I was acutely aware of my lack of higher education compared to my peers. But I was able to bring other skills and experience to the table that made me an asset. I now have the belief that I can learn and achieve anything, as long as I’m willing to work for it.

10. What advice would you give to someone just starting out in their scientific or engineering career, especially in terms of professional development?

I think there are four things that I would suggest:

  1. Work hard.
  2. Don’t be nervous about asking questions.
  3. Believe in yourself.
  4. Put in the effort to gain industry-recognised qualifications – they will be an immense benefit and help you to achieve more in your career.

11. Tell us something about yourself, something that might surprise fellow members?

I have a keen interest in astronomy and astro photography. I find the scale of space and the engineering involved in its exploration fascinating, and really enjoy being able to see or photograph things that are so far away. I also like being able to tell people a bit about what they are seeing if they ask. I also snuck in a trip to the Houston Space Center after the AMPP 2022 Conference, to see the Saturn V rocket which had been a long-held dream!

What do you want to ask a corrosion specialist?

Ben’s career is an inspiration, and demonstrates just how well school/college leavers and career transitioners can do in our industry.

Now it’s over to you. Let us know what you’d like us to ask the next ICorr member we put in the hotseat for 11 questions in 11 minutes. Send us an email, and we’ll try to include your question.

Meet the Corrosion Specialist: Brian Wyatt

Meet the Corrosion Specialist: Brian Wyatt

11 Questions in 11 Minutes

In this article, we’re showcasing Brian Wyatt, Director at Corrosion Control Limited.

We asked him about his professional life, career advice he would give to a younger corrosion specialist, and took a peep into his private life.

Here are the 11 questions we posed in the 11 minutes we took of Brian’s valuable time.

1.     What did you aspire to be when you were younger?

I had a keen interest in aeroplanes, inspired by books I read from an early age; and chemistry, prompted by the gift of a chemistry set that led to ‘experiments’ in a private space in a corner behind a wardrobe. Later, I wanted to study metallurgy.

2.     So, how did you end up as a corrosion specialist?

I was lucky to be sponsored through university by CEGB (Central Electricity Generating Board) who planned and ran all the UK’s electrical power generating stations. I was even luckier to be allocated as a Technical Staff Trainee to the SW Labs at Portsmouth under Doug Peplow (one of three specialists in corrosion and cathodic protection at CEGB). This was at a time when most UK electricity was generated from coal or oil, and many stations were coastal and sea water cooled. Consequently, there were lots of seawater corrosion problems.

Under the CEGB system and the University of Surrey undergraduate programme, I had 14 months in industry and ‘vacations’ based at CEGB Portsmouth. One of these I spent with Doug, John Morgan (who wrote the premier British book on CP and is a Past President of ICorr), Tony Warne and Peter Hayfield (luminaries of Pt/Ti, Pt/Nb and MMO/Ti anodes) crawling inside Marchwood Power Station condenser water boxes which had been suffering from failed CP anodes.

Being with these undoubted experts in CP fired my enthusiasm for this field, and prompted me to select Impressed Current Anode materials as the topic for my final year dissertation.

As well as the power station work, which I loved, I had planned placements with British Aluminium (both at Warrington and their labs at Gerrards Cross), and BISRA (British Iron and Steel Research Association) in both London and Sheffield.

They were great times, during which I met, worked, and became friends with some wonderful people.

I guess my experience is why I am a great believer that time spent in diverse industries is fantastic for young students, particularly those in science and engineering. Both my son and granddaughter benefitted from similar experiences.

3.     What was that first job like?

By the time I graduated, CEGB had restructured its Technical Services, Portsmouth had closed, and Doug’s team dispersed. I had also realised that research was not for me.

Replying to a newspaper advert, I was interviewed for a role as a Junior Cathodic Protection Engineer at Spencer & Partners in London. First by David Lewis (later President of the Institute of Corrosion) and briefly by Ken Spencer, Founder and Senior Partner at Spencer & Partners, previously of Anglo Persian Oil Company (which became BP). They were the leading consultants in CP in the UK at a time when other expert companies were primarily contactors.

With the job secured, I worked in a cramped office with a small window overlooking Buckingham Palace Gardens. My desk had been used by John Thirkettle, who later became a close friend and colleague – he had left to join CWE, one of the competent CP contractors.

For a while Brian Martin, another close friend and very respected colleague from Australia, had a desk while he worked part-time alongside his MSc studies under Lionel Shrier. David Harvey, also a good colleague over the years, who has done much for ICorr, was also a junior CP engineer at that time.

Spencers ran what very few companies can do in present times – a closely monitored, albeit apparently informal, training scheme. I had 12 months of onsite mentoring by one of the best practical CP engineers I have ever known, Norman Sennington, and in the office with Dennis Ames and David Lewis.

As my experience grew, I undertook supervised designs and performance assessments. I can recall sitting alongside David Lewis as he critically assessed many reports that I had slaved over; they were improved afterwards.

I was then ‘let out alone’ first to a planned Bristol Waterworks Purton to Pucklechurch trunk main, were I walked every (muddy) mile, surveyed, designed, specified and inspected all the CP kit (plus, briefly, the pipe coating), supervising its installation and commissioning. The great RE later became general manager of BWW.

Gradually, I took on established inspection and remedial works at multiple ‘Government Controlled Reserve’ sites and multi-product pipelines, from my senior colleagues. I was sent to Pakistan for months to survey and then commission a large gas transmission pipeline system – which meant months living in tents on the construction site and travelling all over Northern Pakistan.

Regular visits to Abu Dhabi (I loved the desert), other Gulf States, Iran and occasionally Africa followed.

Pipelines, tanks, jetties, mainly impressed current CP, were my ‘bread and butter’.

I was encouraged to apply for Professional Membership of ICorr and what was then the Institute of Metals.

I was promoted to Associate Partner alongside Dennis Ames; Mike Allen and others joined the team.

One of my projects was to design galvanic anode CP systems for planned Trinity House monopile (MP) replacements for light ships; sadly this was not implemented (but formed an interesting link to my work now on MPs in offshore wind).

In considering the design of galvanic anodes more closely than was then documented in standards and what were then novel shapes, I had some interesting meetings with BKL Alloys Ltd, then the largest producer of galvanic anodes in Europe. They served the shipping industry and the growing offshore oil/gas sector. We got on well and they proposed that Spencer & Partners and BKL should combine design skills and products to present to North Sea platform developers.

Spencers were not happy, at that time, to work beyond their established consultancy role. BKL offered me a job as Development Manager, to bring them into impressed current and to strengthen their established galvanic anode design team. I accepted.

4.     How did your career progress?

During my time at BKL, I progressed from Development Manager to Engineering Manager.

The company moved from Birmingham to a new build factory and office complex in Telford. Again, great times.

The MD was Bill Mackay. He encouraged me to become a NACE Member, and I started to attend NACE meetings in the US and Canada. With relationships in the US with specialist companies in our field, I was involved in some challenging projects, perhaps the best of which was the Murchison project for which I led the team to design, produce, and supervise the installation of a complex, and what proved to be reliable, North Sea impressed current CP system. This used galvanic anodes and a full impressed current system, forming a hybrid system, with the galvanic anodes providing protection of critical nodes before electrical power was established.

By this time, my friends Tony Warne and Peter Hayfield were heavily involved in the novel ICCP anode design.

Soon after, RTZ purchased BKL from GKN, forming IMPALLOY (I claim credit for the name, Imperial Alloys and BKL Alloys… an idea that came to me in a pub in Shifnal with colleagues from both companies).

A team of us decided that we might do better on our own, and Bill Mackay, Bob Brittain, and I, along with a small group of engineers and admin staff, formed Global Cathodic Protection. My replacement at IMPALLOY was Bob Crundwell, another past President of ICorr.

Some interesting and challenging times followed, both technically and commercially:

  • I formed a joint venture in CP of steel in concrete, Tarmac Global, with the then successful civil construction firm Tarmac.
  • I led the development of the ‘Global Surveyor’ an early close interval potential and combined DC voltage gradient survey system, and we supplied some large and complex fixed offshore CP monitoring systems.
  • During this time I was President of ICorr; also challenging as, when I took over the role, we had very little money in the bank.

Eventually, I and our majority shareholder disagreed on the direction of the company. So I left. Since then, I have worked as an independent consultant in corrosion and, primarily, cathodic protection.

In my consulting life, I’ve had the good fortune to have lots of work in steel in concrete (I was involved in the first Midlands Links CP trial and secured the first commercial Midland Links CP contract… and made a profit!). I have continued to work in the pipelines field and was honoured to be President of CEOCOR, the European technical body in this field.

I have also worked for various MOD coastal sites and other coastal and estuarine ALWC/MIC affected assets. I’ve worked on pipeline projects around the world – some great fun, some not so much. I’ve also worked on lots of offshore CP, first in oil and gas and now in renewables.

Along with many others, I have put a lot of time into the ICorr CP Training and Certification Scheme.

5.     What have you enjoyed most about your career in corrosion?

The competent and wonderful people that I have worked with, or met in conferences and professional bodies, all over the world. Many are now friends. I have learned, and continue to learn, from them.

I have worked for years in Standards Development; again, making lots of friends, sometimes having ‘strong’ discussions, and always learning.

I have enjoyed my ‘expert witness work’, with the intellectual challenge of attempting to ensure every word on the page is accurate, can be defended, and is resilient to what may be a very unfriendly, but extremely bright, barrister.

I have worked for years with decent and supremely competent folk such as John Thirkettle, Chris Lynch, Robin Jacob, and Martin Mowlem. All with their different strengths. All ICorr Members. I have enjoyed the same with overseas members of CEOCOR and, historically, NACE.

6.     What career advice would you give to a young corrosion specialist?

  • Get out of the office, get dirty, collect your own data, record but challenge data that ‘looks wrong’. Seek advice and learn every day.
  • Somehow, and I know it is harder now, spend time in good-quality conferences (EFC, CEOCOR, AMPP, MCF seminars).
  • If challenging, do it with circumspection. Standards can be wrong, or not ideal for the project that you are working on. Do not design by rote but remember, the standards have been developed by experts and so only divert when you have a secure and documented basis for doing – best discussed with and reviewed by a peer.
  • Say no when it is not safe for you, or if your employer or client wants you to leave something that is a risk to others.
  • If necessary, present a coherent case more than once; if you fail to persuade, consider if you wish to work with them.
  • Continue to train.
  • Participate, and share expertise – you will gain by it.
  • If you do not know, there is no shame in saying so. It’s best if you can direct enquiries to someone who does.
  • Finally, enjoy your work. If you are not enjoying what you do, change.

7.     What is in store for corrosion professionals?

There will be a shortage of personnel to work alongside you; we are not training or retaining sufficient graduates or engineers (by whatever route) and you may not have the strong support that I enjoyed.

The converse is that there is more work to do and more scope to divert your career to areas where you can achieve what you want and do what you enjoy most.

8.     What have you gained from your membership of ICorr?

Friends, contacts with other competent professionals. People who I might wish to work with or consult on issues outside my expertise. Many of the key influencers in my professional life are ICorr members; a significant proportion are past Presidents.

Let’s get personal with the corrosion professional!

We know that corrosion professionals aren’t all work and no play, so we asked Brian three final questions to learn a little more about him personally.

9.     What’s your favourite food?

I confess to being a ‘foodie’. There is little that I dislike, and I enjoy anything that is well prepared, from simple to complex – though it should be fresh and as high-quality sourcing as possible. However, I particularly love French and Italian food and products.

10. What do you like doing most outside of your professional life?

Apart from food, I guess my greatest weakness is cars. I am not alone – there are others senior in ICorr with this ‘addiction’!

I have loved driving across Europe and the quieter parts of the UK. Sadly, I find the latter to be seldomly pleasurable now.

I also enjoy sitting quietly with my wife, with a decent glass of wine, and looking across a good view. This might be at home, elsewhere in the UK, or overseas. It’s even better after a nice drive, with the rest of the family present, while we are enjoying good food.

11. Tell us a secret about yourself, something that might surprise fellow members (and something we can print!)

I am an ‘Essex lad’, born within a mile of the main gate of Ford’s Dagenham factory. We escaped when I was 10 and my father’s electrical engineering business became profitable. I never owned a Ford! Even though their products benefitted from the oversight of that great engineer and manager Richard Parry-Jones FREng.

What do you want to ask a corrosion specialist?

The ‘Essex Lad’ has spoken!

Now, over to you. Let us know what you’d like us to ask the next ICorr member we put in the hotseat for 11 questions in 11 minutes. Send us an email, and we’ll try to include your question.